Without partn japanese teen

Fair point, but if who can marry is up for revision why can't who can perform it not also be? For all of the time marriage was a legal term (and before that when it was derived from cultural tradition) marriage was a union of a man and a woman. Deciding we will alter who can be in a marriage while also then declaring who can perform it is off limits seems a little doctrinaire.

I clearly think it's a more serious problem than you do... seeing how you're advocating for people to vote for the candidate who's planning to spend more, and reduce revenue faster than the others. (And lied about releasing a costed platform)

Looks like they are doing everything possible to stave off a full blown revolt...

"and almost certainly out of line with what the normal penalty would be for a first offender for what he did"

Nahhhhhhhh...you are just avoiding my question. You either didn?t do well on the SAT?s or you never took them because College at any level was beyond your abilities or you are a Putz Putin Troll and should be shot as an enemy combatant...

If he refused to serve a gay person because that person was gay, that is bigotry. He pure up refused to do a wedding cake because they were gay. He they were black and he refused because they were black we would not even debate if he was racist or not.

It did in this case. Religion does not trump someone else's right. It will not anyway. The Court delayed ruling on this.

It's like when I design a circuit board. You start with a general idea, but you have to get it to the point of connecting pin 1 on chip U1 to pin 66 on U5. The low level details have to work, not the general idea. So for evolution, the low level is one random mutation. The problem is that it would take many sequential mutations to make anything new, but mutations can only be selected for their immediate effect, not for what will happen in the future after many other mutations.

Looks like he already scrubbed.

Why do you hate people?

Thank you Euv.

Did you read my article? The Bible wasn't the proof I used for Jesus' existence. On the contrary, I used secular historians like Pliny and Tacitus and Flavius Josephus. Try reading first, it'll help you.

My uncle took ours with his little Kodak camera. Probably a dollar for the film and about that much to get them developed

You ask a very good question. What will work? There's no easy answer to cover that. I can tell you this though in absolute certainty. If people are waiting for the government to fix the problem they're in for a very long wait. The government is so inept that can't even fix government. When ever they do something for the "good" of the people it always (or most always) costs us more than what we paid before. The best fix for the health insurance and health care in the USA is for government to keep their sticky fingers off of it. IMHO

Christianity post-dates Jesus as Buddhism post-dates the Buddha.

It wouldn't change a thing for me if Jesus was shown to be only a myth, but of course it's nothing but bizarre crankery at this point.

Did they catch him?

yeah, that irritates

I'll have to find another way to share my stew recipe :)

So you can't even identify the first response correctly.

He is not Shakespeare, he is just an angry internet Atheist.

No! No racism at all. I have had a unique opportunity to observe kids from the three main ethnicities do work. For example, my neighbors on both sides of me, one black family one white, that both have teenage sons that I have offered summer work to. To no avail I would never hire them again. Regardless of race they are lazy. I solicited the help of a young Hispanic teenager and he got the job done without being on his cell phone every five-seconds! They just work harder than American kids of all races!

If one decides to use a word in a different sense or meaning than the accepted definition, communication ceases to be meaningful or possible.

Stopping illegal immigration, deporting all illegal immigrants, deporting immigrants comitting crimes, restricting access to permanent residence and citizenship, mandatory integration courses, and what's more important, treating Islam in the public sphere for what it is: a harmful totalitarian ideology. In this case devout Muslims won't be willing to relocate, and those who flee from Islamic totalitarianism won't have problem rejecting it.

Relevant to me and I thought relevant to the topic.

Don't even try to explain how science works to fanatical bigots like the pair who prowl around here today : they chose to block what we (improperly) call their ''brain'' to any rational and methodical thinking......

Question 3 is about whether God cares that people believe in Jesus as a sacrifice. The way it seems is that God set up this preposterous and unnecessary chain of events just to test to see who actually believed it for no reason.

What do you mean exactly? Very general statement.

Tell us all then why he was beaten if he was complying like his buddy did and his buddy didn't get beaten.

Yeah, we have a while till we see cherries

Maybe out put down the fairy stories and get out of mommies basement for a while

Likewise, you see nothing wrong in mass execution of war prisoners who surrended to Muhammad's mercy, and selling their women and children to slavery.

YOU haven't got a damn clue and Chivington was a CHRISTIAN and you now are going to play the No True Scotsman line of crap. Ok. Bye bye cause I cannot stand Christians like YOU.

Keep in mind that a lot of people forgave Bill Clinton because of what he did in general for the country. Everything from the employment rate to minority housing to welfare reform and one of the best economies we've seen in a long time. People will forgive Trump as well. The downfall of the midterms will be if the voters want to keep everything else he does in check. It happened to Clinton, W and Obama.